Windrow Field Manual
WINDOW OPEN THIS MONTH

Density reduces weathering loss and raises the risk of heating, and the two effects move in opposite directions at the same time. The trade is real and it is not symmetrical.

Denser bales cut storage loss and raise the heat risk

window HAY WINDOWwritten 2026-08-12responsible Windrow Field Manual (a named masthead, not a person)

storage lossheat riskTWO EFFECTS, OPPOSITE DIRECTIONSone is proportional to surface, the other is a thresholdindexdensity
one is proportional to surface, the other is a threshold

[['Density up', 'Falls: less surface per tonne', 'Rises: the core sheds heat more slowly'], ['Density down', 'Rises: more surface, more weather', 'Falls: the bale cools faster'], ['Density up, moisture down', 'Falls on both counts', 'Falls — this is the only free move']]

probe card: the two directions
Change
Effect on storage loss
Effect on heat risk

Why the trade is not symmetrical

Weathering loss is roughly proportional to exposed surface, so it falls steadily as density rises. Heat risk is not proportional to anything so simple: it is a threshold effect, and it rises slowly and then very fast as the bale crosses the moisture the core can tolerate. That asymmetry is why the two effects cannot be traded off with a single number.

DensityStorage loss, outdoorSafe baling moistureNet position
LowHighWide bandCheap to make, expensive to store
MediumModerateModerate bandThe working compromise
HighLowNarrow bandExpensive to get wrong

The move that is free

Denser bales at lower moisture improve both measures at once. There is no trade in that direction, and the reason it is not the standard practice is that lower moisture means waiting, and waiting means weather risk. The trade is therefore between density and time, not between density and storage.

The manual holds that the decision should be made on the storage the bales are going into, not on the bale. Bales going into a barn for six months can be made at the top of the band. Bales going into an outdoor stack cannot, and the density that would help the stack is the density that makes the moisture dangerous.

What the manual would measure next

Where the numbers come from

  1. S1Large Round Bale Storage Costs (Focus on Forage), University of Wisconsin-Madisonsupports the storage-cost framing used when density is being justified
  2. S2Forage Storage, Michigan State University Extensionsupports the forage storage practice the density choice sits inside
  3. S3Moisture Content and the Hay Drying Curve, Field Crop News, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Agribusinesssupports the drying curve that sets how low the moisture can go

One link, one document. No home pages, no search results, no bare domains.

Put this page down Put this page down when you know which storage the bales are going into. That decides the density.